The U.S. and the N.S.A. Scandal : Freedom: The Big American Lie

  • -Aktualisiert am

Up in the sky, freedom has no limits - but Edward Snowden stayed on earth. Chasing him destracts the American public Bild: REUTERS

The U.S. try hard to believe in the internet’s liberating power. Therefore the N.S.A. scandal is forgotten and a new movie is already playing.

          4 Min.

          Why is it so unlikely that Americans will take action to stop the outrageous electronic surveillance programs of the National Security Agency? The answer, to a depressing extent, is that our basic freedoms are threatened today because our political system and our very culture make it nearly impossible for us to act.

          Back in 2005, when the New York Times reported that the NSA was engaged in probably-illegal wiretapping, it ignited a nationwide firestorm. When my progressive friends thought about the subject, it all fit a pattern: These thuggish Republicans, with their stupid militarism, their disregard for the Constitution, their disgusting certainty that God was on their side, of course they were also tapping peoples’ phones! It all made sense given what we knew about the Bush Administration. “Warrantless wiretaps” were one of a string of outrages —the others being “Katrina incompetence” and “Scooter Libby justice”—that Senator Barack Obama used to denounce in his campaign speech as a sort of incantation when he was running for the presidency in 2008. And that’s why, for a certain sort of idealistic liberal, this man Obama was the most desirable presidential candidate imaginable, and why so many greeted his election as something like a deliverance from evil.

          Remember how statesmanship is practiced, American-style

          And today it is Obama himself who countenances something very similar to “warrantless wiretaps.” It is not enough today to say that the president has disappointed his core supporters, or to point out that he and his top advisers today seem to regard idealistic liberals as something of an annoyance. With the NSA spying programs that he has overseen—and with his “kill list,” and with his drone strikes, and with his war on journalists, and with his war on leakers—Obama has actually done far worse than that. He has flown in the face of what he seemed to stand for—of what he promised in fact: open government, a respect for privacy and for the rule of law.

          Those who wonder why a politician would do such a thing must remember how statesmanship is practiced, American-style. To snub and even to wound your most zealous supporters, as Obama has done, is regarded as a mark of maturity in Washington. This is not because snubbing or wounding them is a brave thing to do, but exactly the opposite: Because the righteous attitude of the idealist is repugnant to the men of power, who know that idealists are, in fact, men of weakness, entitled to neither courtesy nor respect.

          What it's like to be treated as a foolish idealist

          What makes them weak is the structure of the American political system. When the public’s choices are limited to one of two parties, idealists have, as the Washington saying puts it, “nowhere else to go.” Since they aren’t about to defect to the other party, their claims on a Democrat’s attention are negligible. Their role is to shut up and cheer.

          I say a “Democrat’s attention” because this is preeminently a dynamic of the Democratic party. Oh, it happens in Republican-land as well, especially to the evangelical army that mobilizes so faithfully every election day. But among Democratic leaders it’s a rite of passage: Snubbing the base and accommodating themselves to the demands of the powerful is simply what Democratic leaders do. It’s in their charter. As the owners of the righteousness of the historical left, they feel they can spurn liberals however they damn well please. Our job, as believers in equality, or privacy, or whatever, is simply to get in line.

          Weitere Themen

          Ist klassische Musik „systemrelevant“?

          Corona-Hilfen : Ist klassische Musik „systemrelevant“?

          Corona hat die klassische Musik hart getroffen. Konzerte fallen aus, Künstler können nicht auftreten. Entscheidend für Hilfsmaßnahmen ist die Frage, wie schützenswert die Klassik ist.


          Ein Soldat des libanesischen Militärs schaut auf den Ort der Explosion in Beiruts Hafen

          Libanon : Mehr als 70 Tote und 3000 Verletzte bei Explosion in Beirut

          Der Libanon steckt derzeit in einer seiner schwersten Krisen seit Jahrzehnten. Mitten in diesen politischen Turbulenzen kommt es am Hafen von Beirut zu einer gewaltigen Explosion. Verantwortlich gewesen sein könnte eine Lagerhalle mit Ammoniumnitrat sein.
          SPD-Politiker Kevin Kühnert

          SPD-Führung : Kühnert auf dem Weg

          Kevin Kühnerts Ziel, der Bundestag, ist der beste Weg, um die SPD-Führung weiter rutschen zu lassen. In wessen Richtung? Dumme Frage.
          Noch eine reine Idylle, soll sie bald für den nächsten „Mission: Impossible“-Teil von Tom Cruise in die Luft gesprengt werden: Die majestätisch in dreißig Metern Höhe über den Bober schwingende Stahlfachwerkbrücke des Ingenieurs Otto Intze von 1905.

          Cruise bedroht Brücke : Was die Wehrmacht nicht schaffte

          Mission: Unmöglich! Tom Cruise will für seinen neuen Film eines der schönsten Brückenmonumente Polens sprengen. Wenn er damit durchkommt, wäre das ein Skandal.


          Immer auf dem Laufenden Sie haben Post! Abonnieren Sie unsere FAZ.NET-Newsletter und wir liefern die wichtigsten Nachrichten direkt in Ihre Mailbox. Es ist ein Fehler aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.
          Vielen Dank für Ihr Interesse an den F.A.Z.-Newslettern. Sie erhalten in wenigen Minuten eine E-Mail, um Ihre Newsletterbestellung zu bestätigen.