http://www.faz.net/-gpf-7oggl

Europe and Ukraine : Putin’s Project

  • -Aktualisiert am

This made the revolution in Ukraine not only a disaster for Russian foreign policy, but a challenge to the Russian regime at home. The weakness of Putin’s policy is that it cannot account for the actions of free human beings who choose to organize themselves in response to unpredictable historical events. Its strength is its tactical dexterity and ideological shamelessness. Thus Eurasia was very quickly modified: it was no longer a dictators’ club and the attempt to destroy the EU, but rather the attempt to destabilize the Ukrainian state and the EU at the same time. Russian propaganda presented the Ukrainian revolution as a Nazi coup, and blamed Europeans for supporting these supposed Nazis. This version, although ridiculous, was much more comfortable in Putin’s mental world, since it removed from view the debacle of Russian foreign policy in Ukraine, and replaced spontaneous action by Ukrainians with foreign conspiracies.

The Russian invasion and occupation of the Ukrainian province of Crimea was a frontal challenge to the European security order as well as to the Ukrainian state. It created the temptation for Germans and others to return to the traditional world of colonial thinking, ignoring decades of law and regarding the Ukrainians as unworthy of statehood. The Russian annexation was carried out, tellingly, with the help of Putin’s extremist allies throughout Europe. No reputable organization would observe the electoral farce by which 97% of Crimeans supposedly voted to be annexed. But a ragtag delegation of right-wing populists, neo-Nazis, and members of the German party Die Linke were happy to come and endorse the results. The German delegation to Crimea was composed of four members of Die Linke and one member of Neue Rechte. This is a telling combination.

Die Linke operate within a certain virtual reality created by Russian propaganda, in which the task of the European Left is now supposed to do, from Moscow’s perspective, is criticize the Ukrainian right – but not the European right, and certainly not the Russian right. Now, there is some basis for such criticism. Ukraine does have a far right, and its members do have some influence. Svoboda, which was Yanukovych’s house opposition, liberated itself from this role during the revolution. In the current Ukrainian government it holds four of twenty portfolios. This overstates both its electoral support, which is about 3%, and its representation in parliament. Some of the people who fought the police during the revolution, although by no means a majority were from a new group called Right Sector, some of whose members are radical nationalists. Its presidential candidate is polling at under 2%, and the group itself has something like three hundred members. There is support for the far right in Ukraine, although less than in most members of the European Union.

Weitere Themen

Ein Signal für Toleranz

Fußball-WM in Russland : Ein Signal für Toleranz

Zunächst hatten die russischen Behörden die Öffnung des „Diversity House“ in St. Petersburg verhindert. Doch die Aktivisten haben ein Ausweichquartier gefunden. Dort werben sie für Toleranz und gegen Rassismus.

Trump will eigene Weltraumarmee Video-Seite öffnen

Dominanz im All : Trump will eigene Weltraumarmee

Größer, schneller, weiter: Präsident Donald Trump will eine amerikanische Dominanz im All haben. Die Space Force soll als eigenständiger Teil der Streitkräfte die Vereinigten Staaten im Weltraum verteidigen.

Topmeldungen

Deutschland bei der WM : War’s das schon?

Einiges deutet darauf hin, dass die gealterten Wohlfühl-Weltmeister trotz des Fehlstarts gegen Mexiko in der Welt der Selbsttäuschung verharren wollen. Das könnte das vorzeitige WM-Aus bedeuten.

Warnung an die Union : SPD: Ohne unser Ja kein Kompromiss im Asylstreit

Im Asylstreit in der Union verschärft jetzt auch der Koalitionspartner den Ton. Ohne Zustimmung der SPD sei keine Einigung im Kabinett möglich, sagt die saarländische SPD-Vorsitzende Rehlinger und kritisiert das „bayerische Tollhaus“. Auch aus Hessen kommen schwere Vorwürfe.

Newsletter

Immer auf dem Laufenden Sie haben Post! Abonnieren Sie unsere FAZ.NET-Newsletter und wir liefern die wichtigsten Nachrichten direkt in Ihre Mailbox. Es ist ein Fehler aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.
Vielen Dank für Ihr Interesse an den F.A.Z.-Newslettern. Sie erhalten in wenigen Minuten eine E-Mail, um Ihre Newsletterbestellung zu bestätigen.