http://www.faz.net/-gsf-7panf

European Commissioner Joaquín Almunia : We discipline Google

  • -Aktualisiert am

The European Commission would not react to unfair practices at Google? Joaquín Almunia opposes the reproach Bild: REUTERS

The European Commissioner for Competition opposes the reproach, that the European Commission would not react to unfair commercial practices at Google. On the contrary, the Commission pressured Google into making concessions.

          Dear Mr Döpfner

          In your open letter to Eric Schmidt, Google’s Executive Chairman, published in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung on 16 April, you make a number of remarks which are explicitly addressed to the European Commission and myself. You essentially accuse the Commission of failing to take action against Google’s abuses of its dominant market position in online search. I reject this, and I will explain why.

          (Zur deutschen Fassung: „Ich diszipliniere Google“ von Joaquín Almunia)

          First, let me recall the facts. The Commission, upon my proposal, decided to open antitrust proceedings against Google in November 2010. After a thorough investigation, in particular through the analysis of a large number of formal complaints, I expressed serious concerns about several of Google’s business practices. One of them is Google’s prominent display, within its normal search results, of its own specialised (or „vertical“) search services without informing users of this favourable treatment. Indeed, such a practice could unduly divert Internet traffic to Google’s services to the detriment of services offered by its competitors, which could be just as relevant, or even more relevant, to the user.

          With the interest of users in mind, the Commission has consistently challenged this practice and asked Google to offer concrete solutions to put an end to any abuse. After long and difficult negotiations, we have obtained significant concessions from Google. In a few months the Commission will have to decide whether or not to turn these concessions into legally binding obligations for Google. If it does, competition will be restored and users will be able to make informed choices when they use the Google search engine.

          Obliged to share

          Approving these proposals would indeed introduce three main changes. First, users would be clearly informed of which links are promoted by Google and are not the result of its normal search engine. Second, there would be a clear separation between Google’s specialised services and the normal search results on its page. Third, whenever it promotes its own services, Google would also have to present the specialised services of three competitors in a way that is clearly visible to users. These rival links would also be displayed in a comparable visual format.

          In your open letter you describe the concessions as the setting up of „a new advertising window at the beginning of the search list“ which would only grant Google „additional earnings“. This interpretation is entirely mistaken. Under the proposals, the links of three competitors would be presented whenever Google promotes its own specialised search service. When merchants do not pay for being displayed in this service (e.g. restaurants in Google Local) then competitors would not have to pay anything either. The three competitors would simply be chosen based on their ranking in Google’s „normal“ search. In other cases, Google charges merchants to appear in its specialised services, such as in the price comparison service Google Shopping. Then, under the proposals Google would be forced to give  a significant part of the space it uses to promote its own services. So whenever Google decides to offer what you call „a new advertising window“, it would be obliged to share it with its competitors, providing them with comparable space inside it. Since the space given to competitors would otherwise have been monetised by Google through payment by merchants, competitors would also pay to appear there. To be selected, Google’s rivals would compete in an auction which would be strictly reserved to providers of specialised search services. Instead of selling this space to its own customers, Google would have to sell it to its competitors. This would not create any „additional earnings“ for Google.

          Weitere Themen

          „Der andere Liebhaber“ Video-Seite öffnen

          Filmkritik : „Der andere Liebhaber“

          Dieser Film ist nicht nur ein Experiment im Geschichten erzählen, sondern auch ein großer visuellen Genuss. - François Ozon spielt mit dem falschen Schein des Kinos zwischen Wahrheit und Lüge.

          Topmeldungen

          Selbstbezogen und selbstzufrieden: Donald Trump (hier bei einem Football-Match am 8. Januar 2018, während die Nationalhymne gesungen wird).

          Trumps Politik : Das amerikanische Wirtschaftswunder

          Anders als von vielen erwartet geht es der Wirtschaft in Amerika heute ziemlich gut. Davon profitiert auch der einfache Arbeiter. Wie stabil ist das wohl alles?
          Außenminister Sigmar Gabriel: „Am kommenden Sonntag schaut nicht nur Europa gebannt auf den SPD-Parteitag.“

          SPD vor dem Parteitag : Gabriel: „Die Welt schaut auf Bonn“

          Martin Schulz kämpft in Düsseldorf vor Parteitagsdelegierten um die Erlaubnis für Groko-Verhandlungen. Auch Sigmar Gabriel redet seiner Partei ins Gewissen – und spricht von einer weltweiten Hoffnung auf die Sozialdemokraten.
          Dunkle Wolken am Dienstag über Bonn: Stürmische Tage stehen bevor

          Tief „Friederike“ : Deutschland drohen stürmische Tage

          Das Tief „Friederike“ hat es in sich: Für Mittwoch erwarten die Metereologen kräftigen Wind, Schnee und Glätte. Am Donnerstag muss sogar mit Orkanböen gerechnet werden – eine Region bleibt allerdings verschont.
          Entschiedener, unmittelbarer, entschlossener: GSG-9-Chef Jerome Fuchs setzt gegen Terroristen auf Härte und Professionalität.

          GSG-9-Chef Fuchs : Der Terroristen-Jäger

          Seine Eliteeinheit wächst und soll einen neuen Standort in Berlin bekommen. Das ist ganz im Sinne ihres 47 Jahre alten Kommandeurs – aber auch eine große Herausforderung für Jerome Fuchs.

          Newsletter

          Immer auf dem Laufenden Sie haben Post! Abonnieren Sie unsere FAZ.NET-Newsletter und wir liefern die wichtigsten Nachrichten direkt in Ihre Mailbox. Es ist ein Fehler aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.
          Vielen Dank für Ihr Interesse an den F.A.Z.-Newslettern. Sie erhalten in wenigen Minuten eine E-Mail, um Ihre Newsletterbestellung zu bestätigen.