http://www.faz.net/-gpc-8yau7

Die von Ihnen angeforderte Seite kann leider nicht ausgeliefert werden. Das tut uns leid. Interessiert Sie eine andere Geschichte von der aktuellen FAZ.NET-Homepage?

ePrivacy-Verordnung : Offener Brief an das Europäische Parlament

  • Aktualisiert am

Das Europäische Parlament in Straßburg Bild: dpa

In einem offenen Brief an das Europäische Parlament wendet sich die Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung gemeinsam mit vielen europäischen Verlagen gegen die neue ePrivacy-Verordnung der EU.

          Wir dokumentieren den von vielen europäischen Verlagen unterzeichneten offenen Brief sowie die Unterschriftenliste im englischen Orginal:

          Open letter to the European Parliament / Council

          Trust, privacy and news - the need to rethink ePrivacy proposals

          We support the objective of the Commission’s draft “ePrivacy” regulation, which has the potential to clean up the digital economy, and to restore citizen trust in how their data is used online. Citizens are rightly concerned about the use of their personal data by third party companies of whom they have never heard, and have no idea about the role that they play in their digital lives online. News organisations depend on the trust of our readers, and we support a system of regulation that restores trust, and cleans up the digital environment. But news organisations also use data generated by readers to improve their products and services by offering readers journalism that is relevant to them, and serving display digital advertising that is relevant to readers.

          As a result of digital distribution, more digital citizens are accessing high quality news and quality information than ever before. But the increasing trend towards consumers accessing news content via third party gateways such as Google News, Facebook, Yahoo, Apple News, MSN (Microsoft) and Amazon Alexa is changing the way that European citizens consume news[1], making publishers ever more reliant on a small number of global platforms as a consequence. Through the current ePrivacy proposals, the Commission proposes that digital citizens must consent to non-strictly necessary tracking on a global basis when they connect to the Internet via a browser interface. Given that 90 per cent of usage across Europe is concentrated in the hands of just four companies: Google, Apple, Microsoft and Mozilla[2], this focus on obtaining user permission via the browser interface has the potential to exacerbate the asymmetry of power between individual publishers and these global digital gateways.

          The ePrivacy proposals contrast with the implication of the Commission’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – due to come into force in May 2018 - which aims to empower user privacy by forcing sites themselves to make sure that users understand and are empowered to control the gathering of data about their browsing behaviour in context of each site that they visit. By creating a single global permission within the browser interface, the Commission´s ePrivacy proposals will make it more difficult to ensure transparency and meaningful user empowerment in practice, and remove any distinction between publishers who place a high value on the trust of their users, and those who do not. While the explanatory memorandum accompanying the ePrivacy proposals does not place an outright ban on publishers communicating with readers in order to seek consent for the use of 3 rd party cookies, in practice, publishers are concerned that it will be incredibly difficult to persuade readers to change their browser settings to allow 3 rd party cookies. As a consequence, individual news organisations would be unable to provide readers with personalised content and marketing, or serve relevant digital advertising within their environments.

          The practice of serving relevant advertising to readers is now an established norm in the advertising industry, and is essential to ensure that publishers can compete with Google and Facebook who already control 20% of total global advertising spend in 2017[3]. If as a result of these proposals, news publishers were unable to serve relevant advertising to our readers, this would reduce our ability to compete with the capabilities of dominant digital platforms for digital advertising revenues, ultimately undermining our ability to invest in high quality journalism across Europe.

          The current ePrivacy proposals will result in the data of European digital citizens being concentrated in the hands of a few global companies, as a result of which, digital citizens will become less protected. It will give those global companies: a tighter grip on the personal data of European digital citizens; further strengthen their dominance in the European digital economy, and; introduce further complexity for individual publishers, despite the European Commission acknowledging these issues are already covered by the regulation that will enter into force in 2018.

          By shifting consent to the collection of data from each individual news site that they visit, to providing a global consent via a small number of powerful gateways, the Commission’s proposals threaten to prevent news organisations from delivering basic functionality such as the marketing of products and services, the tailoring of news products to the needs and desires of news consumers, and relevant and acceptable advertising. The impact on news organisations would be to reduce their ability to deliver high quality products and services, and undermine their ability to generate advertising revenues to reinvest in journalism.

          Therefore it is essential that in implementing the objectives of the “ePrivacy” proposals, the European Parliament / Council must work with the news industry to ensure that the directive provides flexibility of implementation to encourage a direct relationship between each internet user and the trusted news organisations that they visit, not further undermine it.

          Athesia Druck
          Bernhard Paris, Manager Medien

          Class Editori
          Davide Fumagalli, CDO

          DER SPIEGEL
          Thomas Hass, Managing Director
          Jesper Doub, Managing Director SPIEGEL Online

          Die Zeit
          Dr. Rainer Esser, Managing Director Zeitverlag Gerd Bucerius GmbH & Co. KG
          Christian Röpke, Managing Director ZEIT ONLINE GmbH
          Enrique Tarragona, Managing Director ZEIT ONLINE GmbH


          DMG Media
          Kevin Beatty, CEO

          Editoriale Bresciana
          Laura Airaghi, Marketing Director

          EPC
          Angela Mills Wade, Executive Director

          Financial Times
          John Ridding, CEO

          Frankfurter Allgemeine
          Thomas Lindner, CEO

          Gazzetta di Parma
          Mario De Stefano, CDO

          GEDI Gruppo Editoriale
          Monica Mondardini, CEO

          Groupe Bayard / La Croix
          Georges Sanerot, Président du Directoire

          Groupe Figaro CCM Benchmark
          Marc Feuillée, Directeur général

          Groupe L´Equipe
          Cyril Linette, Directeur général

          Groupe Le Monde
          Louis Dreyfus, Président du Directoire

          Groupe Les Echos / Le Parisien
          Francis Morel, CEO

          Gruner + Jahr
          Julia Jaekel, CEO
          Arne Wolter, CDO

          Grupa Wirtualna Polska
          Michal Branski, Board Member and VP Product Strategy

          Gruppo 24 Ore
          Franco Moscetti, CEO

          Guardian Media Group
          David Pemsel, CEO

          IMPRESA
          Francisco Pinto Balsemão, Chairman

          L'Humanité
          Patrick Le Hyaric, President du directoire et directeur

          Libération
          François Dieulesaint, Gérant

          MEDIAHUIS
          Gert Ysebaert, CEO

          NRC
          Rien van Beemen, CEO

          Persgroup
          Christian Van Thillo, CEO

          PRISA
          José Luis Sainz, CEO

          Sanoma
          Susan Duinhoven, President & CEO

          Schibsted Media Group
          Rolv Erik Ryssdal, CEO

          SETA
          Gianluigi Campari, CEO

          Süddeutsche Zeitung
          Stefan Hilscher, Managing Director Süddeutscher Verlag GmbH
          Johannes Vogel, Managing Director Süddeutsche Zeitung Digitale Medien GmbH

          Telegraph Media Group
          Murdoch MacLennan, CEO

          Unidad Editorial
          Javier Cabrerizo, Managing Director

          [1] 1 The latest Reuters News Report - which surveyed citizens across the world - found that “ half (51%) say they use social media as a source of news each week. More than a quarter of 18–24s say social media (28%) are their main source of news – more than television (24%) for the first time.” As a result of these changes, the Reuters survey found that the “growth of news accessed and increasingly consumed via social networks, portals and mobile apps means that the originating news brand gets clearly noticed less than half the time in the UK, and Canada. In countries like Japan and South Korea, where aggregated and distributed news is already more widespread, the brand only gets noticed around a quarter of the time when accessed through news portals.”

          [2] https://www.statista.com/statistics/269881/market-share-held-by-internet-browsers-in-europe/

          [3] https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/may/02/google-and-facebook-bring-in-one-fifth-of-global-ad-revenue

          Weitere Themen

          Debakel über Debakel

          FAZ.NET-Sprinter : Debakel über Debakel

          Nicht nur CSU und SPD mussten am Wochenende herbe Pleiten einstecken – auch die DFB-Elf ist in akuter Erklärungsnot. Was sonst noch wichtig wird, steht im FAZ.NET-Sprinter.

          Topmeldungen

          Die Ermittlungen der Staatsanwaltschaft bringen Opel nicht vorwärts.

          Auto-Kommentar : Opel am Diesel-Pranger

          Die Liste der Autobauer, gegen die deutsche Staatsanwälte ermitteln, wird immer länger. Opel treffen die Ermittlungen hart – weil die Sanierung alle Kräfte braucht. Und die Autobauer müssten eigentlich klimafest werden.
          Historisch ist die Anmutung des Berliner Kammergerichts. Das Bitcoin-Urteil ist dagegen zukunftsweisend.

          Bitcoin-Urteil : Niederlage für Bafin, kein Sieg für Krypto-Fans

          Der Handel mit Bitcoin ist keine Bankgeschäft und erst recht keine Straftat, hat das Kammergericht Berlin geurteilt und die Finanzaufsicht Bafin gerügt. Es macht vor allem deutlich, wie groß der juristische Handlungsbedarf ist.

          Newsletter

          Immer auf dem Laufenden Sie haben Post! Abonnieren Sie unsere FAZ.NET-Newsletter und wir liefern die wichtigsten Nachrichten direkt in Ihre Mailbox. Es ist ein Fehler aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.
          Vielen Dank für Ihr Interesse an den F.A.Z.-Newslettern. Sie erhalten in wenigen Minuten eine E-Mail, um Ihre Newsletterbestellung zu bestätigen.